GREENSBORO, NC - MAY 25: Former Democratic presidential candidate and former U.S. Senator John Edwards (D-NC) (4th L) leaves a federal courthouse with his parents Bobbie (3rd L) and Wallace Edwards (L) at the end of the day of May 25, 2012 in Greensboro, North Carolina. The jury of the John Edwards trial has wrapped up its sixth day of deliberations without reaching to a verdict. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife) |
With the Political Fix Is In Crowd leaning on the judge and the prosecutors to get guilty verdicts and bury Edwards, are the prosecutors and the judge motivated to declare this trial a mistrial? It would appear they are strongly motivated at this point to save their careers since they are no longer confident they can deliver a conviction.
After three days of jury deliberations, and the particular requests from the jury, especially in regard to the Mellon exhibits and transcript testimony, it would appear the jury smells a rat. The judge denied the Mellon transcript testimony and ordered the jury to rely upon their memories. That's odd. Since when does a judge deny a jury the trial testimony they have just heard? How is she trying to influence the jury?